I just checked again with
check-auth@verifier.port25.com and all seems fine :
This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
service at verifier.port25.com. The service allows email senders to perform
a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided
free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While
it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
<verifier-feedback@port25.com>.
Thank you for using the verifier,
The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team
==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check: pass
DomainKeys check: pass
DKIM check: pass
Sender-ID check: pass
SpamAssassin check: ham
==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================
HELO hostname: trader.adresemail.com
Source IP: 188.215.51.97
mail-from: suport@adresemail.com
----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mailfrom=suport@adresemail.com
DNS record(s):
adresemail.com. 300 IN SPF "v=spf1 a mx ~all"
adresemail.com. 300 IN A 188.215.51.97
----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=suport@adresemail.com
DNS record(s):
private._domainkey.adresemail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DKIM1; g=*; k=rsa; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDXxyGgqk/RaBv6HO/DwMZzohjY7x+aOOXNl80EQSCNkU+nr7JdyMyKu+WnRZPZgrvbCrGo6Nz4TzG4aha4XYsEObqt+HJfqovcVQ94FaawMyCZxqsCD51unOf851HIDCLcMJo6LCevKb0MLJmY3VRShZPNWKQ1SNYWt33gIvJIMQIDAQAB"
----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass (matches From: suport@adresemail.com)
ID(s) verified: header.d=adresemail.com
Canonicalized Headers:
message-id:<344A85AFB4444980A868799D66540940@traderPC>'0D''0A'
from:"AdreseMail"'20'<suport@adresemail.com>'0D''0A'
to:<check-auth@verifier.port25.com>'0D''0A'
subject:spf'20'rec'0D''0A'
date:Tue,'20'10'20'Sep'20'2013'20'09:29:23'20'+0300'0D''0A'
mime-version:1.0'0D''0A'
content-type:multipart/alternative;'20'boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0"'0D''0A'
dkim-signature:v=1;'20'a=rsa-sha1;'20'c=relaxed;'20'd=adresemail.com;'20'h='20'message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type;'20's='20'private;'20'bh=m7B3VGaAVYBbSyQegRRvB/O8NaI=;'20'b=
Canonicalized Body:
Acesta'20'este'20'un'20'mesaj'20'cu'20'mai'20'multe'20'par?i'20''EE'n'20'format'20'MIME.'0D''0A'
'0D''0A'
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0'0D''0A'
Content-Type:'20'text/plain;'0D''0A'
'09'charset="iso-8859-1"'0D''0A'
Content-Transfer-Encoding:'20'quoted-printable'0D''0A'
'0D''0A'
spf'20'record'20'?'0D''0A'
'0D''0A'
'0D''0A'
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0'0D''0A'
Content-Type:'20'text/html;'0D''0A'
'09'charset="iso-8859-1"'0D''0A'
Content-Transfer-Encoding:'20'quoted-printable'0D''0A'
'0D''0A'
<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>'0D''0A'
<BODY'20'dir=3Dltr>'0D''0A'
<DIV'20'dir=3Dltr>'0D''0A'
<DIV'20'style=3D"FONT-SIZE:'20'12pt;'20'FONT-FAMILY:'20''27'Calibri'27';'20'COLOR:'20'#000000">'0D''0A'
<DIV>spf'20'record'20'?</DIV>'0D''0A'
<DIV> </DIV>'0D''0A'
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>'0D''0A'
'0D''0A'
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0--'0D''0A'
DNS record(s):
private._domainkey.adresemail.com. 300 IN TXT "v=DKIM1; g=*; k=rsa; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDXxyGgqk/RaBv6HO/DwMZzohjY7x+aOOXNl80EQSCNkU+nr7JdyMyKu+WnRZPZgrvbCrGo6Nz4TzG4aha4XYsEObqt+HJ3qov87VQE4FaawMyCZxqsCD51unOfhu51HIDCLcMJo6LievKb0MLJmY3VRShZPNWKQ1SNYWt33gIvJIMQIDAQAB"
Public key used for verification: private._domainkey.adresemail.com (1024 bits)
NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.
----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=suport@adresemail.com
DNS record(s):
adresemail.com. 300 IN SPF "v=spf1 a mx ~all"
adresemail.com. 300 IN A 188.215.51.97
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.3.1 (2010-03-16)
Result: ham (-4.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451)
==========================================================
SPF and Sender-ID Results
=========================
"none"
No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain.
"neutral"
The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not
want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized
to send mail using the sender's DNS domain.
"pass"
The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or
relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain.
"policy"
The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf
of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication
method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is
unacceptable.
"fail"
This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or
relay mail using the sender's DNS domain.
"softfail"
The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized
to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is
unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect.
"temperror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
retrieve a policy record from DNS. A later attempt may produce a
final result.
"permerror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or
a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record. A later attempt is
unlikely to produce a final result.
DKIM and DomainKeys Results
===========================
"none"
The message was not signed.
"pass"
The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed
verification tests.
"fail"
The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification
test(s).
"policy"
The message was signed but the signature or signatures were
not acceptable to the verifier.
"neutral"
The message was signed but the signature or signatures
contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
processed. This result SHOULD also be used for other
failures not covered elsewhere in this list.
"temperror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability
to retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a
final result.
"permerror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being
absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.
==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================
Return-Path: <suport@adresemail.com>
Received: from trader.adresemail.com (188.215.51.97) by verifier.port25.com id h5qu3s11u9ck for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 02:29:18 -0400 (envelope-from <suport@adresemail.com>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suport@adresemail.com
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; domainkeys=pass header.From=suport@adresemail.com
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; dkim=pass (matches From: suport@adresemail.com) header.d=adresemail.com
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; sender-id=pass header.From=suport@adresemail.com
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=private; d=adresemail.com;
b=wHzBgkQjzwqMa02TXYJtNitsqKf5OL5Ug2eCEAI6br7TvsgZnxiPFuDhzCMPqe+xkWWiQdsfLn6IW2faKyCKHVDSa1jOSI9VBLCQc9dcBkEGgcS5mjHl5nkaZFLUYP47wNCstn/b6dHGwtPQE1abq+UkrtfnLiQyjUa9X/0gz4k=;
h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:Importance:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=adresemail.com; h=
message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type; s=
private; bh=m7B3VGaAVYBbSyQegRRvB/O8NaI=; b=zWa2zcNMcfnU94KzCcoO
UMzzzoBuHulojDkVyB6A5mNKUGwJf2LJk8TAlQBjslF5B2+bUvXBhJzY3x+Ur5VU
ByG/kb9YqukHbK0lI71P8T9GXNkhXyUr00OZfDREhIMItY4gXY6pxl4rOtuerGdv
5T0H8H7jnJXYtuw4ZAuekRU=
Received: (qmail 17528 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2013 06:28:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO traderPC) (suport@adresemail.com@86.105.94.7)
by trader.adresemail.com with ESMTPA; 10 Sep 2013 06:28:00 -0000
Message-ID: <344A85AFB4444980A868799D66540940@traderPC>
From: "AdreseMail" <suport@adresemail.com>
To: <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>
Subject: spf rec
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:29:23 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3508.205
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3508.205
Acesta este un mesaj cu mai multe par?i în format MIME.
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
spf record ?
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=3Dltr>
<DIV dir=3Dltr>
<DIV style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>spf record ?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CEAE08.3C1280A0--
But the mail are still going to Gmail SPAM folder and the same problem on header :
Received: from unknown (HELO traderPC) (suport@adresemail.com@86.105.94.7)